 |
| HRW owes its legitimacy to corrupt mainstream media |
Blogger Just Read has reproduced a letter from a human rights group known as Human Rights Watch to our Prime Minister, urging Malaysia to rescind the ban on Seksualiti Merdeka.
What exactly is this Human Right Watch? Is it really a genuine group fighting for human rights of the global citizens? Or is it just another organization that has nothing at all to do with human rights?
In a two-part series, an alternative view is presented to expose the true nature of this organization. This first part below (written on 2nd October 2011) shows that it is another imperialist tool to mislead the public.
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: ANOTHER IMPERIALIST TOOL TO MISLEAD PUBLIC OPINION
By MKERone
Most of the people think that Human Rights Watch (HWR) is a non-profit, 100% independent organization. They also believe that its aim is to defend and protect HUMANS. We mostly hear about this organization in war times.
But the name of this organization is misleading! "Human Rights Watch." Really?
A BRIEF RECAP ON HRW'S RECENT INGLORIOUS BACKGROUND
Their mission statement says the following:
By MKERone
Most of the people think that Human Rights Watch (HWR) is a non-profit, 100% independent organization. They also believe that its aim is to defend and protect HUMANS. We mostly hear about this organization in war times.
But the name of this organization is misleading! "Human Rights Watch." Really?
A BRIEF RECAP ON HRW'S RECENT INGLORIOUS BACKGROUND
Their mission statement says the following:
"Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all."
They claim that they stand with the victims. Who are the victims they stand with? In an excellent article Jonathan Aziziah [who runs the Mask of Zion website] explains the role this organization has played in Iraq, and how it helped the oil giants and corrupt politicians in justifying the Gulf War, by providing fake reports and by deliberately spreading wrong information. He also explains how this organization recently played a roll in justifying a possible future western intervention in Syria.
 |
| Abu Salim Prison |
In another article, he exposes the organization's background and links with pro-Zionist, eugenic theory supporters, and with Mahmoud Jibril's [ex-Chairman of Libya's National Transitional Council] main funder, George Soros. Aziziah also reminds us of the role HWR played in spreading the Abu Salim hoax [the false story about the slaughter of Libyans at Abu Salim prison in June 1996, which were used justify the Libyan “revolution”]. We now know for sure that the Abu Salim's mainstream media story was absolutely false and served to demonize [the late] Muammar Gaddafi. The only thing that could be found in Abu Salim prison were camel bones. [Read further about the Abu Salim massacre hoax here and here.]
HOW HRW MISLEADS PUBLIC OPINION
After 7 months of destruction in Libya, and tens of thousands of innocent civilians dead under NATO missiles often full of depleted uranium, HRW comes up with an article warning of "arbitrary arrests and abuse of detainees". Who are they kidding? Where are their reports on residential areas being bombed by NATO? Where are their reports on the use of depleted uranium against the civilian population? Where are their reports on NATO killing thousand of civilians during the carpet-bombing of entire cities? Where are their reports on the ethnic cleansing of Black Africans? (Massive information can be found on Black Africans being persecuted and lynched by the rebels, for example here). We, at CounterPsyOps, couldn't find any of those reports. Why doesn't HRW file a lawsuit against [British Prime Minister] Cameron, [French President] Sarkozy, [US President] Obama and other rulers who actively participated in the destruction of Libya?
In its mission statement [quoted above], HRW states "we investigate human rights violation and hold abusers accountable." If this was really the case, the organization would stand up against ALL abuses on human rights, even those committed by the Western world.
Furthermore, we now have some reports filtering in mainstream media, talking about how some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) worrying about the humanitarian crisis in [the Libyan cities of] Sirte and Beni Walid. Beware of the words being used. HUMANITARIAN CRISIS has been ongoing since day one. Humanitarian crisis happens when bombs fall from the sky on innocent civilians. By talking of humanitarian crisis ONLY about Sirte and Beni Walid, the mainstream media made a very "smart" move in trying to make all the rest of the atrocities committed appear as minor facts.
As in all other war zones, the mainstream media, HRW and other deceitful NGOs talk about "Humanitarian Crisis" only when there are power shortages, food shortages, lack of water, etc. These are only a few elements of what a HUMANITARIAN CRISIS really is!
IN THE PURSUIT OF LEGITIMACY: BELATED AND USELESS INDICTMENTS
HOW HRW MISLEADS PUBLIC OPINION
After 7 months of destruction in Libya, and tens of thousands of innocent civilians dead under NATO missiles often full of depleted uranium, HRW comes up with an article warning of "arbitrary arrests and abuse of detainees". Who are they kidding? Where are their reports on residential areas being bombed by NATO? Where are their reports on the use of depleted uranium against the civilian population? Where are their reports on NATO killing thousand of civilians during the carpet-bombing of entire cities? Where are their reports on the ethnic cleansing of Black Africans? (Massive information can be found on Black Africans being persecuted and lynched by the rebels, for example here). We, at CounterPsyOps, couldn't find any of those reports. Why doesn't HRW file a lawsuit against [British Prime Minister] Cameron, [French President] Sarkozy, [US President] Obama and other rulers who actively participated in the destruction of Libya?
In its mission statement [quoted above], HRW states "we investigate human rights violation and hold abusers accountable." If this was really the case, the organization would stand up against ALL abuses on human rights, even those committed by the Western world.
Furthermore, we now have some reports filtering in mainstream media, talking about how some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) worrying about the humanitarian crisis in [the Libyan cities of] Sirte and Beni Walid. Beware of the words being used. HUMANITARIAN CRISIS has been ongoing since day one. Humanitarian crisis happens when bombs fall from the sky on innocent civilians. By talking of humanitarian crisis ONLY about Sirte and Beni Walid, the mainstream media made a very "smart" move in trying to make all the rest of the atrocities committed appear as minor facts.
As in all other war zones, the mainstream media, HRW and other deceitful NGOs talk about "Humanitarian Crisis" only when there are power shortages, food shortages, lack of water, etc. These are only a few elements of what a HUMANITARIAN CRISIS really is!
IN THE PURSUIT OF LEGITIMACY: BELATED AND USELESS INDICTMENTS
 |
| George Bush, whose administration is accused by HRW of authorizing the use of torture. |
I already know what some people will reply to me. HRW is totally independent and has no link with politics, because they once said that George Bush should be prosecuted over torture. Indeed, they have said that. But when did they say that? In 2011! The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq started 10 years ago and reports exposing torture by independent journalists and analysts have been available since then. Did it HRW really take 10 years to notice what was really going on in Afghanistan and Iraq? In 2011, Bush was already out of office. What can be done against him now? Not much anymore.
Plus, HRW talks about prosecuting him over "torture". What about "Crimes against Humanity"? This would make more sense when you know that more than a million and a half civilians died, that depleted uranium was used against civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq (see the effects of it on Afghans and Iraqis new-born babies), along with cluster bombs and white phosphorus, that civil infrastructure and buildings (roads, schools, hospitals) have been destroyed - the fact is that those two countries have been brought back to stone age.
Plus, HRW talks about prosecuting him over "torture". What about "Crimes against Humanity"? This would make more sense when you know that more than a million and a half civilians died, that depleted uranium was used against civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq (see the effects of it on Afghans and Iraqis new-born babies), along with cluster bombs and white phosphorus, that civil infrastructure and buildings (roads, schools, hospitals) have been destroyed - the fact is that those two countries have been brought back to stone age.
 |
| The effects of depleted uranium on Afghans and Iraqis new-born babies. |
This is just another proof of whose interests HRW really serves, under the guise of defending and protecting the "victims".
CONCLUSION
Let me repeat my question: which victims does HRW stand with [or protect]? They stand with fake victims. They actually stand with the criminals and help them justifying the use of bombs and heavy artillery to destroy sovereign nations and kill innocent people.
HRW owes its legitimacy to corrupt mainstream media. Those who are willing to investigate a bit further than what they're being told, can easily understand whose interests this organization serves.
[Source: Mathaba. Edited. Images added]
Further reading: Who is behind Human Rights Watch? (provided by a commentator, Chuck Moore, in blogger Just Read's article cited above)
CONCLUSION
Let me repeat my question: which victims does HRW stand with [or protect]? They stand with fake victims. They actually stand with the criminals and help them justifying the use of bombs and heavy artillery to destroy sovereign nations and kill innocent people.
HRW owes its legitimacy to corrupt mainstream media. Those who are willing to investigate a bit further than what they're being told, can easily understand whose interests this organization serves.
[Source: Mathaba. Edited. Images added]
Further reading: Who is behind Human Rights Watch? (provided by a commentator, Chuck Moore, in blogger Just Read's article cited above)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please adhere to proper blog etiquette when posting your comments. This blog owner will exercise his absolution discretion in allowing or rejecting any comments that are deemed seditious, defamatory, libelous, racist, vulgar, insulting, and other remarks that exhibit similar characteristics. If you insist on using anonymous comments, please write your name or other IDs at the end of your message.